Re: [PATCH] Machine-readable RTL dumps: print_rtx_function

2016-10-03 Thread David Malcolm
On Sun, 2016-10-02 at 07:04 -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:36:29AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > > On 09/29/2016 11:25 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote: > > > On 09/29/2016 07:47 PM, David Malcolm wrote: > > > > This patch adds a new function, print_rtx_function, intended > > > > f

Re: [PATCH] Machine-readable RTL dumps: print_rtx_function

2016-10-02 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:36:29AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > On 09/29/2016 11:25 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote: > >On 09/29/2016 07:47 PM, David Malcolm wrote: > >>This patch adds a new function, print_rtx_function, intended for use > >>for generating function dumps suitable for parsing by the RTL fronten

Re: [PATCH] Machine-readable RTL dumps: print_rtx_function

2016-09-29 Thread Jeff Law
On 09/29/2016 11:25 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote: On 09/29/2016 07:47 PM, David Malcolm wrote: This patch adds a new function, print_rtx_function, intended for use for generating function dumps suitable for parsing by the RTL frontend, but also intended to be human-readable, and human-authorable.

Re: [PATCH] Machine-readable RTL dumps: print_rtx_function

2016-09-29 Thread Bernd Schmidt
On 09/29/2016 07:47 PM, David Malcolm wrote: This patch adds a new function, print_rtx_function, intended for use for generating function dumps suitable for parsing by the RTL frontend, but also intended to be human-readable, and human-authorable. (note 1 0 4 (nil) NOTE_INSN_DELETED)

[PATCH] Machine-readable RTL dumps: print_rtx_function

2016-09-29 Thread David Malcolm
This patch adds a new function, print_rtx_function, intended for use for generating function dumps suitable for parsing by the RTL frontend, but also intended to be human-readable, and human-authorable. I put the function in its own file (rather than print-rtl.c) to avoid having to recompile all t