> Yes, this is OK.
Committed as SVN 225536.
Regards,
Andrew
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Bennett [mailto:andrew.benn...@imgtec.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 12:14 PM
> To: Moore, Catherine; Matthew Fortune; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] MIPS: Update stack-1.c testcase to match micromips
> jra
> > I'm not sure this is the right approach here. If we get a jraddiusp then the
> > problem that the test is trying to cover can't possibly happen anyway.
> > (The test is checking if a load and final stack adjustment are ever re-
> ordered
> > from what I can see.)
> >
> > I'd just mark the test
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Fortune [mailto:matthew.fort...@imgtec.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 11:00 AM
> To: Andrew Bennett; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: Moore, Catherine
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] MIPS: Update stack-1.c testcase to match micromips
>
Andrew Bennett writes:
> The stack-1.c testcase fails when being compiled for micromips with the
> -O0 optimization level. The reason is the testcase is expecting the
> following sequence at the end of the function:
>
>addiu $sp,$sp,16
>jrc $31
>
> But for micromips it gen
Hi,
The stack-1.c testcase fails when being compiled for micromips with the -O0
optimization level. The reason is the testcase is expecting the following
sequence at the end of the function:
addiu $sp,$sp,16
jrc $31
But for micromips it generates the following:
jradd
