On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 5:44 AM Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> This fixes the incorrect assumption that was done in r14-3721-ge6bcf839894783,
> that being able to doing the negative after the conversion would be a valid
> thing
> but really it is not valid for boolean types.
>
> OK? Bootstrapped and te
This fixes the incorrect assumption that was done in r14-3721-ge6bcf839894783,
that being able to doing the negative after the conversion would be a valid
thing
but really it is not valid for boolean types.
OK? Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux-gnu.
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR tree-optimiza
