On Mar 30, 2023, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Mar 2023, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> How about this, does this seem useful?
> I like it - helpful and easy to understand. :-)
'k, I'm putting it in, thanks
On Mar 30, 2023, Arsen Arsenović wrote:
> IMO, yes - in fact, the libstdc++ manual e
On Thu, 30 Mar 2023, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> How about this, does this seem useful?
I like it - helpful and easy to understand. :-)
Gerald
Hi Alexandre,
Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches writes:
> Hello, Gerald,
>
> On Feb 11, 2023, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 23 Jun 2022, Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches wrote:
>>> Introduce -nostdlib++ option
>>>
>>> Using g++ to link without libstdc++, as in g++.dg/abi/pure-virtual1.C,
>>>
Hello, Gerald,
On Feb 11, 2023, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jun 2022, Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> Introduce -nostdlib++ option
>>
>> Using g++ to link without libstdc++, as in g++.dg/abi/pure-virtual1.C,
>> is error prone, because there's no way to tell g++ to drop libstdc+
On Thu, 23 Jun 2022, Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Introduce -nostdlib++ option
>
> Using g++ to link without libstdc++, as in g++.dg/abi/pure-virtual1.C,
> is error prone, because there's no way to tell g++ to drop libstdc++
> without also dropping libc and any other libraries that the
On 9/16/22 07:52, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 6/24/22 01:23, Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches wrote:
On Jun 23, 2022, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
Here's the patch. Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu, also tested with a
cross to aarch64-rtems6. Ok to install?
Introduce -nostdlib++ option
Uhh, I went
On 9/16/22 07:52, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 6/24/22 01:23, Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches wrote:
On Jun 23, 2022, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
Here's the patch. Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu, also tested with a
cross to aarch64-rtems6. Ok to install?
Introduce -nostdlib++ option
Uhh, I went
On 6/24/22 01:23, Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches wrote:
On Jun 23, 2022, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
Here's the patch. Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu, also tested with a
cross to aarch64-rtems6. Ok to install?
Introduce -nostdlib++ option
Uhh, I went ahead and installed this. The earlier
On Jun 23, 2022, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> Here's the patch. Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu, also tested with a
> cross to aarch64-rtems6. Ok to install?
> Introduce -nostdlib++ option
Uhh, I went ahead and installed this. The earlier patch was approved if
nobody objected, and so, having ove
On Jun 22, 2022, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> Yeah, I suppose that makes sense, it's beneficial for users to avoid the
> cognitive overload of dealing with equivalent options with different
> spellings. I'll swallow my dislike for the spelling and change the
> patch to use -nostdlib++.
Here's the p
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 4:29 PM Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> On Jun 22, 2022, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>
> > It makes some sense to have the option named -nostdlib++ if a target
> > might add multiple libs (and/or make other changes) for linking C++.
>
> if it was nostdlibc++, I'd agree. lib++ is not so
On Jun 22, 2022, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> It makes some sense to have the option named -nostdlib++ if a target
> might add multiple libs (and/or make other changes) for linking C++.
if it was nostdlibc++, I'd agree. lib++ is not something that brings
C++ to (my) mind.
> (so, fo example, if libstdc
> On 22 Jun 2022, at 01:36, Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>
> On Jun 21, 2022, Fangrui Song wrote:
>
>> Is this similar to clang -nostdlib++ ?
>> When libstdc++ is selected, clang -nostdlib++ removes -lstdc++.
>
> Sounds like they're the same indeed, but the clang option you men
On Jun 21, 2022, Fangrui Song wrote:
> Is this similar to clang -nostdlib++ ?
> When libstdc++ is selected, clang -nostdlib++ removes -lstdc++.
Sounds like they're the same indeed, but the clang option you mention
makes little sense to me, so I'd rather to introduce the one that does.
If someone
On 2022-06-21, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 9:53 AM Fangrui Song wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 1:43 AM Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 7:56 AM Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Using g++ to link without libstdc++, as in g
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 9:53 AM Fangrui Song wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 1:43 AM Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 7:56 AM Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Using g++ to link without libstdc++, as in g++.dg/abi/pure-virtual1
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 1:43 AM Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 7:56 AM Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Using g++ to link without libstdc++, as in g++.dg/abi/pure-virtual1.C,
> > is error prone, because there's no way to tell g++ to drop libs
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 7:56 AM Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
>
> Using g++ to link without libstdc++, as in g++.dg/abi/pure-virtual1.C,
> is error prone, because there's no way to tell g++ to drop libstdc++
> without also dropping libc and any other libraries that the target
> implicit
Using g++ to link without libstdc++, as in g++.dg/abi/pure-virtual1.C,
is error prone, because there's no way to tell g++ to drop libstdc++
without also dropping libc and any other libraries that the target
implicitly links in.
This has often led to the need for manual adjustments to this
testca
19 matches
Mail list logo
