On 1/26/22 04:11, Martin Liška wrote:
Hello.
Right now, switch lowering does not update basic_block::count values
so that they are uninitiliazed. Moreover, I've updated probability scaling
when a more complex expansion happens. There are still some situations
where
the profile is a bit impre
PING^4
On 4/7/22 16:00, Martin Liška wrote:
PING^3
On 3/24/22 11:22, Martin Liška wrote:
PING^2
On 3/4/22 14:47, Martin Liška wrote:
PING^1
On 1/26/22 12:11, Martin Liška wrote:
Hello.
Right now, switch lowering does not update basic_block::count values
so that they are uninitiliazed. Mor
PING^3
On 3/24/22 11:22, Martin Liška wrote:
PING^2
On 3/4/22 14:47, Martin Liška wrote:
PING^1
On 1/26/22 12:11, Martin Liška wrote:
Hello.
Right now, switch lowering does not update basic_block::count values
so that they are uninitiliazed. Moreover, I've updated probability scaling
when a
PING^2
On 3/4/22 14:47, Martin Liška wrote:
PING^1
On 1/26/22 12:11, Martin Liška wrote:
Hello.
Right now, switch lowering does not update basic_block::count values
so that they are uninitiliazed. Moreover, I've updated probability scaling
when a more complex expansion happens. There are stil
PING^1
On 1/26/22 12:11, Martin Liška wrote:
Hello.
Right now, switch lowering does not update basic_block::count values
so that they are uninitiliazed. Moreover, I've updated probability scaling
when a more complex expansion happens. There are still some situations where
the profile is a bit i
Hello.
Right now, switch lowering does not update basic_block::count values
so that they are uninitiliazed. Moreover, I've updated probability scaling
when a more complex expansion happens. There are still some situations where
the profile is a bit imprecise, but the patch improves rapidly the cu
