On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 12:16 AM Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Tue, 5 Oct 2021, H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 3:07 AM Richard Biener wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 4 Oct 2021, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > >
> > > > commit adedd5c173388ae505470df152b9cb3947339566
> > > > Author: Jakub Jelinek
> > >
On Tue, 5 Oct 2021, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 3:07 AM Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 4 Oct 2021, H.J. Lu wrote:
> >
> > > commit adedd5c173388ae505470df152b9cb3947339566
> > > Author: Jakub Jelinek
> > > Date: Tue May 3 13:37:25 2016 +0200
> > >
> > > re PR target/4924
On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 3:07 AM Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Mon, 4 Oct 2021, H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> > commit adedd5c173388ae505470df152b9cb3947339566
> > Author: Jakub Jelinek
> > Date: Tue May 3 13:37:25 2016 +0200
> >
> > re PR target/49244 (__sync or __atomic builtins will not emit 'lock
>
On Mon, 4 Oct 2021, H.J. Lu wrote:
> commit adedd5c173388ae505470df152b9cb3947339566
> Author: Jakub Jelinek
> Date: Tue May 3 13:37:25 2016 +0200
>
> re PR target/49244 (__sync or __atomic builtins will not emit 'lock
> bts/btr/btc')
>
> optimized bit test on atomic builtin return with
commit adedd5c173388ae505470df152b9cb3947339566
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Tue May 3 13:37:25 2016 +0200
re PR target/49244 (__sync or __atomic builtins will not emit 'lock
bts/btr/btc')
optimized bit test on atomic builtin return with lock bts/btr/btc. But
it works only for unsigned in