Re: [PATCH] Improve XMM16+ handling in *vec_concatv2di

2016-06-02 Thread Kirill Yukhin
Hello Jakub, On 01 Jun 22:17, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > This is the last pattern I'm aware of that didn't have any v/Yv constraints > that ought to be changed (there perhaps are others which have v/Yv in some > of the alternatives, but not in all the ones that could use it). > > The testcase

[PATCH] Improve XMM16+ handling in *vec_concatv2di

2016-06-01 Thread Jakub Jelinek
Hi! This is the last pattern I'm aware of that didn't have any v/Yv constraints that ought to be changed (there perhaps are others which have v/Yv in some of the alternatives, but not in all the ones that could use it). The testcases show what are the changes useful for. Bootstrapped/regtested o