Re: [PATCH] Improve FAIL message for dump-*-times functions.

2017-10-17 Thread Martin Liška
On 10/11/2017 06:56 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: Hi! On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 10:14:29AM +0200, Martin Liška wrote: This patch helps to find why an expected number of scan patterns does not match: FAIL: gcc.dg/unroll-3.c scan-tree-dump-times cunrolli "loop with 3 iterations completely unrolle

Re: [PATCH] Improve FAIL message for dump-*-times functions.

2017-10-11 Thread Segher Boessenkool
Hi! On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 10:14:29AM +0200, Martin Liška wrote: > This patch helps to find why an expected number of scan patterns does not > match: > > FAIL: gcc.dg/unroll-3.c scan-tree-dump-times cunrolli "loop with 3 iterations > completely unrolled" 222 (found 1 times) > FAIL: c-c++-commo

Re: [PATCH] Improve FAIL message for dump-*-times functions.

2017-10-11 Thread Jeff Law
On 10/11/2017 02:14 AM, Martin Liška wrote: > Hi. > > This patch helps to find why an expected number of scan patterns does not > match: > > FAIL: gcc.dg/unroll-3.c scan-tree-dump-times cunrolli "loop with 3 iterations > completely unrolled" 222 (found 1 times) > FAIL: c-c++-common/attr-simd-2.

[PATCH] Improve FAIL message for dump-*-times functions.

2017-10-11 Thread Martin Liška
Hi. This patch helps to find why an expected number of scan patterns does not match: FAIL: gcc.dg/unroll-3.c scan-tree-dump-times cunrolli "loop with 3 iterations completely unrolled" 222 (found 1 times) FAIL: c-c++-common/attr-simd-2.c -Wc++-compat scan-assembler-times _ZGVbN4_simd_attr: 11