Re: [PATCH] Improve -f{,no}-vect-cost-model

2017-01-05 Thread Richard Biener
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 10:15 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 01:31:28PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: >> > And not sure why this actually >> > is RejectNegative, wouldn't >> > Common Alias(fvect-cost-model=,dynamic,unlimited) >> > work just on fvect-cost-model (can test that)? >

[PATCH] Improve -f{,no}-vect-cost-model

2017-01-04 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 01:31:28PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: > > And not sure why this actually > > is RejectNegative, wouldn't > > Common Alias(fvect-cost-model=,dynamic,unlimited) > > work just on fvect-cost-model (can test that)? > > Good question ;) If it works, ok. And here is a patch f