On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 12:54 AM Roger Sayle wrote:
>
> I've been investigating some (float)i == CST optimizations for match.pd,
> and noticed there's already a TODO comment in match.pd that's relatively
> easy to implement. When CST is a NaN, we only need to worry about
> exceptions with flag_tr
I've been investigating some (float)i == CST optimizations for match.pd,
and noticed there's already a TODO comment in match.pd that's relatively
easy to implement. When CST is a NaN, we only need to worry about
exceptions with flag_trapping_math, and equality/inequality tests for
sNaN only behave