On 31/07/19 17:57 -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 08:43:50PM +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jul 2019, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>So something like the attached patch. The glibc says the
>values I used have enough digits for IEEE quad-precision:
>
>/* The above cons
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 08:43:50PM +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Jul 2019, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> >So something like the attached patch. The glibc says the
> >values I used have enough digits for IEEE quad-precision:
> >
> >/* The above constants are not adequate for computation usi
On 31/07/19 21:16 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 07:58:55PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Perhaps add __extension__ before the literals too?
Does that do anything for Q literals? I thought I'd tried it
previously and decided it didn't. I'm happy to add it though.
You're
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 07:58:55PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > Perhaps add __extension__ before the literals too?
>
> Does that do anything for Q literals? I thought I'd tried it
> previously and decided it didn't. I'm happy to add it though.
You're right, it works well that way only in C,
On 31/07/19 20:50 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 07:37:03PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 31/07/19 19:07 +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Jul 2019, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> > The values of the constants are taken from Glibc where the equivalent
> > constant exists
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 07:37:03PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 31/07/19 19:07 +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
> > On Wed, 31 Jul 2019, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >
> > > The values of the constants are taken from Glibc where the equivalent
> > > constant exists, or by rounding the actual constant t
On Wed, 31 Jul 2019, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
So something like the attached patch. The glibc says the
values I used have enough digits for IEEE quad-precision:
/* The above constants are not adequate for computation using `long double's.
Therefore we provide as an extension constants with sim
On 31/07/19 19:07 +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jul 2019, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
The values of the constants are taken from Glibc where the equivalent
constant exists, or by rounding the actual constant to the same number
of digits as the Glibc constants have.
How does it behave with _
On Wed, 31 Jul 2019, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
The values of the constants are taken from Glibc where the equivalent
constant exists, or by rounding the actual constant to the same number
of digits as the Glibc constants have.
How does it behave with __float128? I think that with -std=gnu++2a, it
The values of the constants are taken from Glibc where the equivalent
constant exists, or by rounding the actual constant to the same number
of digits as the Glibc constants have.
P0631R4 Math Constants
* include/Makefile.am: Add new header.
* include/Makefile.in: Regenera
10 matches
Mail list logo
