Hi,
On Wed, Jan 18 2023, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> The code removing function bodies when the last call graph clone of a
>> node is removed is too aggressive when there are nodes up the
>> clone_of chain which still need them. Fixed by expanding the check.
>>
>> gcc/ChangeLog:
>>
>> 2023-01-18 Mar
> The code removing function bodies when the last call graph clone of a
> node is removed is too aggressive when there are nodes up the
> clone_of chain which still need them. Fixed by expanding the check.
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> 2023-01-18 Martin Jambor
>
> PR ipa/107944
> * cgra
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 16 2023, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 1/14/23 22:36, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>>> Noticed during building of libbackend.a with the LTO partial linking.
>>>
>>> The function release_body is called even if clone_of is a clone
>>> of a another function and thus it shares tree declaration. We sh
On 1/14/23 22:36, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> Noticed during building of libbackend.a with the LTO partial linking.
>>
>> The function release_body is called even if clone_of is a clone
>> of a another function and thus it shares tree declaration. We should
>> preserve it in that situation.
>>
> Hi.
>
> Noticed during building of libbackend.a with the LTO partial linking.
>
> The function release_body is called even if clone_of is a clone
> of a another function and thus it shares tree declaration. We should
> preserve it in that situation.
>
> Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu
Hi,
sorry for getting to this so late.
On Thu, Dec 01 2022, Martin Liška wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Noticed during building of libbackend.a with the LTO partial linking.
The testcase is areally nice one, too bad it's probably impossible to
get it small enough to be included in the testcase. But it also f
PING^2
On 12/9/22 09:28, Martin Liška wrote:
> PING^1
>
> On 12/1/22 10:59, Martin Liška wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> Noticed during building of libbackend.a with the LTO partial linking.
>>
>> The function release_body is called even if clone_of is a clone
>> of a another function and thus it shares tree
PING^1
On 12/1/22 10:59, Martin Liška wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Noticed during building of libbackend.a with the LTO partial linking.
>
> The function release_body is called even if clone_of is a clone
> of a another function and thus it shares tree declaration. We should
> preserve it in that situation.
Hi.
Noticed during building of libbackend.a with the LTO partial linking.
The function release_body is called even if clone_of is a clone
of a another function and thus it shares tree declaration. We should
preserve it in that situation.
Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regre
