On Tue, 10 Dec 2013, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
> Hi Joseph,
>
> Forgot to follow up on this patch. Here it is with a small update to
> check if 'p' got updated to a difference position. Does this now look okay?
OK.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
On 2013/7/14 09:27 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Jul 2013, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
>
>> Original patch posted as part of Nios II patches:
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-04/msg01087.html
>>
>> This patch is to allow hexadecimal numbers to be used in option
>> arguments, e.g. -fal
On Sun, 14 Jul 2013, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
> Original patch posted as part of Nios II patches:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-04/msg01087.html
>
> This patch is to allow hexadecimal numbers to be used in option
> arguments, e.g. -falign-loops=0x10 can now be used as equivalent to
> -fal
Original patch posted as part of Nios II patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-04/msg01087.html
This patch is to allow hexadecimal numbers to be used in option
arguments, e.g. -falign-loops=0x10 can now be used as equivalent to
-falign-loops=16.
Joseph, the patch has been modified to us
