On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 12:47 PM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> PING^1
OK
> On 8/8/19 10:43 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> > On 8/7/19 4:12 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 2:04 PM Martin Liška wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 8/7/19 12:51 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 1
PING^1
On 8/8/19 10:43 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 8/7/19 4:12 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 2:04 PM Martin Liška wrote:
>>>
>>> On 8/7/19 12:51 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 12:44:28PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 8/7/19 11:51 AM, Richard Bie
On 8/7/19 4:12 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 2:04 PM Martin Liška wrote:
>>
>> On 8/7/19 12:51 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 12:44:28PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
On 8/7/19 11:51 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> I think the simplest way to achieve th
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 2:04 PM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 8/7/19 12:51 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 12:44:28PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> >> On 8/7/19 11:51 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> I think the simplest way to achieve this is to not copy, aka clear,
> >>> DECL_IS_O
On 8/7/19 12:51 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 12:44:28PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
>> On 8/7/19 11:51 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> I think the simplest way to achieve this is to not copy, aka clear,
>>> DECL_IS_OPERATOR_* when cloning and removing arguments
>>> (cloning for a
On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 12:44:28PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 8/7/19 11:51 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > I think the simplest way to achieve this is to not copy, aka clear,
> > DECL_IS_OPERATOR_* when cloning and removing arguments
> > (cloning for a constant align argument should be OK for ex
On 8/7/19 11:51 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> I think the simplest way to achieve this is to not copy, aka clear,
> DECL_IS_OPERATOR_* when cloning and removing arguments
> (cloning for a constant align argument should be OK for example, as is
> for a constant address). Or simply always when cloning
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 2:42 PM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 8/5/19 3:46 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> > On Mon, 5 Aug 2019, Martin Liška wrote:
> >
> >> You are right. It can really lead to confusion of the DCE.
> >>
> >> What we have is DECL_ABSTRACT_ORIGIN(decl) which we can use to indicate
> >> opera
On 8/5/19 3:46 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Aug 2019, Martin Liška wrote:
>
>> You are right. It can really lead to confusion of the DCE.
>>
>> What we have is DECL_ABSTRACT_ORIGIN(decl) which we can use to indicate
>> operators
>> that were somehow modified by an IPA optimization.
>
> Loo
On Mon, 5 Aug 2019, Martin Liška wrote:
You are right. It can really lead to confusion of the DCE.
What we have is DECL_ABSTRACT_ORIGIN(decl) which we can use to indicate
operators
that were somehow modified by an IPA optimization.
Looks similar to the cgraph_node->clone_of that Richard was
On 8/5/19 1:57 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Aug 2019, Martin Liška wrote:
>
>> On 8/5/19 9:07 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
>>> On Mon, 5 Aug 2019, Martin Liška wrote:
>>>
I'm sending fix for the ICE. The issue is that we can end up
with a ctor without an argument (when not being used).
>
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 8:44 AM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 8/2/19 11:34 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 4:50 AM Martin Liška wrote:
> >>
> >> Second part.
> >>
> >> Martin
> >
> > This caused:
> >
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91334
> >
>
> Hi.
>
> I'm sending fix
On Mon, 5 Aug 2019, Martin Liška wrote:
On 8/5/19 9:07 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Mon, 5 Aug 2019, Martin Liška wrote:
I'm sending fix for the ICE. The issue is that we can end up
with a ctor without an argument (when not being used).
Ah, I didn't realize that after cloning and drastically c
On 8/5/19 9:07 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Aug 2019, Martin Liška wrote:
>
>> I'm sending fix for the ICE. The issue is that we can end up
>> with a ctor without an argument (when not being used).
>
> Ah, I didn't realize that after cloning and drastically changing the
> signature it woul
On Mon, 5 Aug 2019, Martin Liška wrote:
I'm sending fix for the ICE. The issue is that we can end up
with a ctor without an argument (when not being used).
Ah, I didn't realize that after cloning and drastically changing the
signature it would still count as operator new/delete. Is getting do
:55:45 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Handle new operators with no arguments in DCE.
gcc/ChangeLog:
2019-08-05 Martin Liska
PR c++/91334
* tree-ssa-dce.c (propagate_necessity): Handle new operators
with not arguments.
(eliminate_unnecessary_stmts): Likewise.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2019-08-0
16 matches
Mail list logo