On Thu, 14 Jan 2016, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Fri, 8 Jan 2016 09:16:55 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Dec 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > > On 10/12/15 14:14, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, 3 Dec 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > > > > > Essentially we have two situation
Hi!
On Fri, 8 Jan 2016 09:16:55 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Dec 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > On 10/12/15 14:14, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 3 Dec 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > > > > Essentially we have two situations:
> > > > > - in the host compiler, there is no need for t
On Wed, 16 Dec 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 10/12/15 14:14, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > [ copy-pasting-with-quote from
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg00420.html , for some
> > reason I didn't get this email ]
> >
> > > On Thu, 3 Dec 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > > > The flag is s
On 10/12/15 14:14, Tom de Vries wrote:
[ copy-pasting-with-quote from
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg00420.html , for some
reason I didn't get this email ]
On Thu, 3 Dec 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
The flag is set here in expand_omp_target:
...
12682 /* Prevent IPA from re
[ copy-pasting-with-quote from
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg00420.html , for some
reason I didn't get this email ]
On Thu, 3 Dec 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
The flag is set here in expand_omp_target:
...
12682 /* Prevent IPA from removing child_fn as unreachable,
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 12:09:04PM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote:
> The flag is set here in expand_omp_target:
> ...
> 12682 /* Prevent IPA from removing child_fn as unreachable,
> since there are no
> 12683refs from the parent function to child_fn in offload
>
On Thu, 3 Dec 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 03/12/15 09:59, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Thu, 3 Dec 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
> >
> > > On 03/12/15 01:10, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I've managed to reproduce it. The difference between pass and fail is
> > > > whether the compiler is co
On 03/12/15 09:59, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, 3 Dec 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 03/12/15 01:10, Tom de Vries wrote:
I've managed to reproduce it. The difference between pass and fail is
whether the compiler is configured with or without accelerator.
I'll look into it.
In the configurat
On Thu, 3 Dec 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 03/12/15 01:10, Tom de Vries wrote:
> >
> > I've managed to reproduce it. The difference between pass and fail is
> > whether the compiler is configured with or without accelerator.
> >
> > I'll look into it.
>
> In the configuration with accelerator
On 03/12/15 01:10, Tom de Vries wrote:
I've managed to reproduce it. The difference between pass and fail is
whether the compiler is configured with or without accelerator.
I'll look into it.
In the configuration with accelerator, the flag node->force_output is on
for foo._omp.fn.
This cau
On 03/12/15 00:31, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 02/12/15 18:58, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Hi!
On Tue, 1 Dec 2015 15:25:42 +0100, Tom de
Vries wrote:
>Handle BUILT_IN_GOACC_PARALLEL in ipa-pta
>* c-c++-common/goacc/kernels-alias-ipa-pta-2.c: New test.
>* c-c++-common/goacc/kernels-alias-ipa-pta
On 02/12/15 18:58, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Hi!
On Tue, 1 Dec 2015 15:25:42 +0100, Tom de Vries wrote:
>Handle BUILT_IN_GOACC_PARALLEL in ipa-pta
>* c-c++-common/goacc/kernels-alias-ipa-pta-2.c: New test.
>* c-c++-common/goacc/kernels-alias-ipa-pta-3.c: New test.
>* c-c++-common/goac
Hi!
On Tue, 1 Dec 2015 15:25:42 +0100, Tom de Vries wrote:
> Handle BUILT_IN_GOACC_PARALLEL in ipa-pta
> * c-c++-common/goacc/kernels-alias-ipa-pta-2.c: New test.
> * c-c++-common/goacc/kernels-alias-ipa-pta-3.c: New test.
> * c-c++-common/goacc/kernels-alias-ipa-pta.c: New tes
On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 12:46:47AM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote:
> Does this explanation address your concern?
Yeah, for now it is fine I hope.
Jakub
On 01/12/15 15:44, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 03:25:42PM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote:
Handle BUILT_IN_GOACC_PARALLEL in ipa-pta
2015-12-01 Tom de Vries
* tree-ssa-structalias.c (find_func_aliases_for_builtin_call)
(find_func_clobbers, ipa_pta_execute): Handle
On Tue, 1 Dec 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
> [ was: Re: [PATCH, PR46032] Handle BUILT_IN_GOMP_PARALLEL in ipa-pta ]
>
> On 30/11/15 17:36, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > On 30/11/15 14:24, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > On Mon, 30 Nov 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 30/11/15 10:16, Richard Biener
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 03:25:42PM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote:
> Handle BUILT_IN_GOACC_PARALLEL in ipa-pta
>
> 2015-12-01 Tom de Vries
>
> * tree-ssa-structalias.c (find_func_aliases_for_builtin_call)
> (find_func_clobbers, ipa_pta_execute): Handle BUILT_IN_GOACC_PARALLEL.
Isn't th
[ was: Re: [PATCH, PR46032] Handle BUILT_IN_GOMP_PARALLEL in ipa-pta ]
On 30/11/15 17:36, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 30/11/15 14:24, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, 30 Nov 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 30/11/15 10:16, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, 30 Nov 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
this patch
18 matches
Mail list logo