> The above hunk is not needed anymore, is it?
Right.
> Ok for trunk without that hunk (and with Makefile.in regenerated again).
Done, r205482.
-Y
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 03:29:02PM +0400, Yury Gribov wrote:
> > I wonder if this can't be done through
> > just adding -fno-rtti to AM_CXXFLAGS and say
> > ubsan_handlers_cxx.% ubsan_type_hash.% : AM_CXXFLAGS += -frtti
>
> Yup, that did the trick. Attaching modified patch.
> @@ -13,11 +13,13 @@
> I wonder if this can't be done through
> just adding -fno-rtti to AM_CXXFLAGS and say
> ubsan_handlers_cxx.% ubsan_type_hash.% : AM_CXXFLAGS += -frtti
Yup, that did the trick. Attaching modified patch.
diff --git a/libsanitizer/ubsan/Makefile.am b/libsanitizer/ubsan/Makefile.am
index e98984a..
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 12:01:50PM +0400, Yury Gribov wrote:
> As discussed in http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106
> only a subset of libubsan should be built with RTTI support.
> Attached patch adds custom build rules for relevant files.
We assume GNU make I think, I wonder if this
> Wasn't that already checked in?
No, that's an addition to previous commit.
-Y
On 11/27/13 01:01, Yury Gribov wrote:
Hi all,
As discussed in http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106 only a
subset of libubsan should be built with RTTI support. Attached patch
adds custom build rules for relevant files.
Wasn't that already checked in?
commit 5e0d610a433356af747fded
Hi all,
As discussed in http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106 only a
subset of libubsan should be built with RTTI support. Attached patch
adds custom build rules for relevant files.
-Y
diff --git a/libsanitizer/ubsan/Makefile.am b/libsanitizer/ubsan/Makefile.am
index e98984a..eaab
