On 2016.10.29 at 19:56 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> Hi Kyrill!
>
> On Mon, 2016-10-24 15:56:48 +0100, Kyrill Tkachov
> wrote:
> > This is a slight update over [1] with Richard's feedback addressed.
> > In terminate_all_aliasing_chains we now terminate the chain early if
> > the destination
Hi Kyrill!
On Mon, 2016-10-24 15:56:48 +0100, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
> This is a slight update over [1] with Richard's feedback addressed.
> In terminate_all_aliasing_chains we now terminate the chain early if
> the destination is writing to a base offset by a variable amount.
> This avoids walki
On 27/10/16 14:31, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, 24 Oct 2016, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
This is a slight update over [1] with Richard's feedback addressed.
In terminate_all_aliasing_chains we now terminate the chain early if
the destination is writing to a base offset by a variable amount
On Mon, 24 Oct 2016, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a slight update over [1] with Richard's feedback addressed.
> In terminate_all_aliasing_chains we now terminate the chain early if
> the destination is writing to a base offset by a variable amount.
> This avoids walking the store c
Hi all,
This is a slight update over [1] with Richard's feedback addressed.
In terminate_all_aliasing_chains we now terminate the chain early if
the destination is writing to a base offset by a variable amount.
This avoids walking the store chain and performing more alias checks.
The param max-s