On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 01:15:18PM +0100, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> > But OTOH it may well be the case that other things in cleanup_cfg make
> > the known dominance info invalid as well, in which case just the comment
> > is a bit misleading. Sounds likely to me :-)
>
> Yeah, that's what I worry
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 04:32:36PM +0100, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
>>> Am 12.11.2019 um 15:32 schrieb Segher Boessenkool
>>> :
>>> On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 03:11:05PM +0100, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
unsigned int
pass_jump_after_combine::execute (function *)
{
+ /* Jump threadin
Hi!
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 04:32:36PM +0100, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> > Am 12.11.2019 um 15:32 schrieb Segher Boessenkool
> > :
> > On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 03:11:05PM +0100, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> >> unsigned int
> >> pass_jump_after_combine::execute (function *)
> >> {
> >> + /* Jump threa
> Am 12.11.2019 um 15:32 schrieb Segher Boessenkool
> :
>
> Hi!
>
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 03:11:05PM +0100, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
>> try_forward_edges does not update dominance info, and merge_blocks
>> relies on it being up-to-date. In PR92430 stale dominance info makes
>> merge_blocks pro
Hi!
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 03:11:05PM +0100, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> try_forward_edges does not update dominance info, and merge_blocks
> relies on it being up-to-date. In PR92430 stale dominance info makes
> merge_blocks produce a loop in the dominator tree, which in turn makes
> delete_basic
On Tue, 12 Nov 2019, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-redhat-linux, s390x-redhat-linux
> and ppc64le-redhat-linux. OK for trunk and gcc-9-branch?
>
> try_forward_edges does not update dominance info, and merge_blocks
> relies on it being up-to-date. In PR92430 stal
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-redhat-linux, s390x-redhat-linux
and ppc64le-redhat-linux. OK for trunk and gcc-9-branch?
try_forward_edges does not update dominance info, and merge_blocks
relies on it being up-to-date. In PR92430 stale dominance info makes
merge_blocks produce a loop in th
