Re: [PATCH] Fortran : ICE for division by zero in declaration PR95882

2020-08-26 Thread Thomas Koenig via Gcc-patches
Hi Mark, OK to commit and backport? OK. Thanks for the patch! Best regards Thomas

[PATCH] Fortran : ICE for division by zero in declaration PR95882

2020-08-24 Thread Mark Eggleston
Second attempt, this time with the correct attachment. OK to commit and backport? [PATCH] FortranĀ  : ICE for division by zero in declaration PR95882 A length expression containing a divide by zero in a character declaration will result in an ICE if the constant is anymore complicated that a

Re: [PATCH] Fortran : ICE for division by zero in declaration PR95882

2020-08-24 Thread Mark Eggleston
On 25/08/2020 07:13, Mark Eggleston wrote: On 24/08/2020 17:42, Thomas Koenig wrote: Hi Mark, OK to commit and backport? The test cases mentioned in the ChangeLog are not in the patch, instead there is the test case for PR 96624. Could you correct that? Whoops, yes I'll fix that. It is

Re: [PATCH] Fortran : ICE for division by zero in declaration PR95882

2020-08-24 Thread Mark Eggleston
On 24/08/2020 17:42, Thomas Koenig wrote: Hi Mark, OK to commit and backport? The test cases mentioned in the ChangeLog are not in the patch, instead there is the test case for PR 96624. Could you correct that? Whoops, yes I'll fix that. Best regards Thomas -- https://www.codethi

Re: [PATCH] Fortran : ICE for division by zero in declaration PR95882

2020-08-24 Thread Thomas Koenig via Gcc-patches
Hi Mark, OK to commit and backport? The test cases mentioned in the ChangeLog are not in the patch, instead there is the test case for PR 96624. Could you correct that? Best regards Thomas

[PATCH] Fortran : ICE for division by zero in declaration PR95882

2020-08-24 Thread Mark Eggleston
Please find attached a fix for PR95882. Tested on x86_64 with bootstrap. OK to commit and backport? FortranĀ  : ICE for division by zero in declaration PR95882 A length expression containing a divide by zero in a character declaration will result in an ICE if the constant is anymore complicated