Hi Andre,
Am 03.03.25 um 10:08 schrieb Andre Vehreschild:
Hi Harald,
in +++ b/gcc/fortran/symbol.cc
@@ -4624,12 +4624,28 @@ verify_bind_c_derived_type (gfc_symbol *derived_sym)
there is
+ else if (!pedantic)
+ gfc_warning (0, "Derive ...
To me the "not pedantic" is counter-intuiti
Hi Harald,
in +++ b/gcc/fortran/symbol.cc
@@ -4624,12 +4624,28 @@ verify_bind_c_derived_type (gfc_symbol *derived_sym)
there is
+ else if (!pedantic)
+ gfc_warning (0, "Derive ...
To me the "not pedantic" is counter-intuitive. In pedantic mode I would have
expected this to be at leas
Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Harald Anlauf
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2025 22:20:28 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Fortran: reject empty derived type with bind(C) attribute
[PR101577]
PR fortran/101577
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
* symbol.cc (verify_bind_c_derived_type): Generate error message
for derived type with no
