Hi Harald,
> I just looked at that thread. I guess if you answer Mikael's
> questions at
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-September/601744.html
> the patch will be fine.
Amended patch, adding the required testing of signalling vs. quiet behaviour.
I still need to get an OK on th
Hi FX,
Am 06.06.23 um 21:29 schrieb FX Coudert via Gcc-patches:
Hi,
This is a repost of the patch at
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-September/600887.html
which never really got green light, but I stopped pushing because stage 1 was
closing and I was out of time.
I just looke
Hi,
This is a repost of the patch at
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-September/600887.html
which never really got green light, but I stopped pushing because stage 1 was
closing and I was out of time.
It depends on a middle-end patch adding a type-generic __builtin_iseqsig(),
whi
Le 02/09/2022 à 13:37, FX via Fortran a écrit :
Hi,
These operations were added to Fortran 2018, and correspond to well-defined
IEEE comparison operations, with defined signaling semantics for NaNs. All are
implemented in terms of GCC expressions and built-ins, with no library support
needed.
> IIRC there was discussion about abort on the ML some years ago where folks
> decided to switch to stop N.
> I don't think I participated in that discussion, maybe somebody remembers the
> reasoning or is able to find the thread.
Found it: https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/fortran/2018-02/msg00105.
On 2 September 2022 17:54:00 CEST, FX wrote:
>Hi Bernhard,
>
>> Please do not call the non-standard abort, but use stop N.
>
>Is there a specific reason? It’s a well-documented GNU extension, and it’s
>useful because it can easily display a backtrace and give line info for the
>failure, unlike S
Hi Bernhard,
> Please do not call the non-standard abort, but use stop N.
Is there a specific reason? It’s a well-documented GNU extension, and it’s
useful because it can easily display a backtrace and give line info for the
failure, unlike STOP.
I’ll replace if there is consensus, but apart fr
On 2 September 2022 13:37:41 CEST, FX via Fortran wrote:
>Hi,
Please do not call the non-standard abort, but use stop N.
IIRC I once had a trivial script..
https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org&q=subject:%22%5C%5BPATCH%2C+OpenACC%5C%5D+Fortran+deviceptr%22&o=newest&f=1
Hi,
These operations were added to Fortran 2018, and correspond to well-defined
IEEE comparison operations, with defined signaling semantics for NaNs. All are
implemented in terms of GCC expressions and built-ins, with no library support
needed.
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-linux, both
