On 13 January 2015 at 00:01, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Jan 11, 2015, at 2:33 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
>> oops, sorry about this. We will build further flattening patches with
>> --enable-languages=all,go,jit,ada.
>> Shall that cover all the front-ends ?
>
> No objc++ is non-default:
Thanks!
On Jan 11, 2015, at 2:33 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
> oops, sorry about this. We will build further flattening patches with
> --enable-languages=all,go,jit,ada.
> Shall that cover all the front-ends ?
No objc++ is non-default:
$ grep build_by_default */config-lang.in
go/config-lang.in:build
On 12 January 2015 at 16:24, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> I'm getting this testsuite regression:
>
> FAIL: gcc.dg/plugin/ggcplug.c compilation
Fixed with r219458.
Thanks,
Prathamesh
>
> In file included from
> /usr/local/gcc/gcc-20150112/gcc/testsuite/../../gcc/tree.h:23:0,
> from
>
I'm getting this testsuite regression:
FAIL: gcc.dg/plugin/ggcplug.c compilation
In file included from
/usr/local/gcc/gcc-20150112/gcc/testsuite/../../gcc/tree.h:23:0,
from
/usr/local/gcc/gcc-20150112/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/plugin/ggcplug.c:8:
/usr/local/gcc/gcc-20150112/gcc/test
On Sat, 2015-01-10 01:50:42 +0530, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
> On 9 January 2015 at 16:21, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Michael Collison
> > wrote:
> > > This patch flattens tree.h and tree-core.h. This is a revised
> > > patch that does not include tree-core.h a
On 10 January 2015 at 03:17, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-01-10 at 01:50 +0530, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>> On 9 January 2015 at 16:21, Richard Biener
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Michael Collison
>> > wrote:
>> >> This patch flattens tree.h and tree-core.h. This is
On Sat, 2015-01-10 at 01:50 +0530, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> On 9 January 2015 at 16:21, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Michael Collison
> > wrote:
> >> This patch flattens tree.h and tree-core.h. This is a revised patch that
> >> does not include tree-core.h as a r
On 10 January 2015 at 02:58, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 01:50:42AM +0530, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>> >> I bootstrapped on x86 with all languages. I also bootstrapped on all
>> >> targets
>> >> listed in contrib/config-list.mk with c and c++ enabled.
>> >>
>> >> Is this okay
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 01:50:42AM +0530, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> >> I bootstrapped on x86 with all languages. I also bootstrapped on all
> >> targets
> >> listed in contrib/config-list.mk with c and c++ enabled.
> >>
> >> Is this okay for trunk?
> >
> > Ok.
> Committed as r219402 on behalf o
On 9 January 2015 at 16:21, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Michael Collison
> wrote:
>> This patch flattens tree.h and tree-core.h. This is a revised patch that
>> does not include tree-core.h as a result of flattening.
>>
>> Version 3 of the patch adds the header files
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Michael Collison
wrote:
> This patch flattens tree.h and tree-core.h. This is a revised patch that
> does not include tree-core.h as a result of flattening.
>
> Version 3 of the patch adds the header files removed from tree-core.h to
> gcc-plugin.h in order to allo
This patch flattens tree.h and tree-core.h. This is a revised patch that
does not include tree-core.h as a result of flattening.
Version 3 of the patch adds the header files removed from tree-core.h to
gcc-plugin.h in order to allow ggc-common.c to compile. This is a recent
issue seen on trunk
12 matches
Mail list logo
