On Sat, 2019-12-21 at 00:34 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As mentioned in the PR, the following testcase is miscompiled with avx512vl.
> The reason is that the fma *_bcst_1 define_insns have two alternatives:
> "=v,v" "0,v" "v,0" "m,m" and use the same
> vfmadd213* %3, %2, %0
> pattern. I
Hi!
As mentioned in the PR, the following testcase is miscompiled with avx512vl.
The reason is that the fma *_bcst_1 define_insns have two alternatives:
"=v,v" "0,v" "v,0" "m,m" and use the same
vfmadd213* %3, %2, %0
pattern. If the first alternative is chosen, everything is ok, but if the
second
