On 03 Mar 21:17, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 01:08:41PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Fixed thusly, unfortunately I don't have access to avx512f (and not even to
> > avx512dq) hw, so while I will bootstrap/regtest it on Haswell-E, can't test
> > the tests if they now work at ru
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 01:08:41PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Fixed thusly, unfortunately I don't have access to avx512f (and not even to
> avx512dq) hw, so while I will bootstrap/regtest it on Haswell-E, can't test
> the tests if they now work at runtime (they link and the assembly of the foo
>
Hi Jakub,
On 03 Mar 13:08, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> routine has changed and looks good to me). Can somebody test this please
> on real hw or emulator?
I'll run testing on the simulator.
--
Thanks, K
Hi!
Unlike the older vec_set_hi 256-bit patterns, which are correctly
using the VEC_SELECT as the first operand of VEC_CONCAT and
match_operand as second, because that is what the instruction does,
picks up low part from operand 1 and puts the operand 2 as the high part
of the result, the 512-bit
