On 07/02/14 02:14, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
Most of this probably doesn't need explanation, just the
expand_sdiv_pow2 change - shift_cost only tracks shift counts to
MAX_BITS_PER_WORD (but, for consistency between e.g. i?86 and x86_64 -m32
we'd better use BITS_PER_WORD instead as in most other e
On Jul 2, 2014, at 1:14 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
wide-int part, Ok.
> * wide-int-print.cc (print_decs): Negate UHWI instead of HWI.
> --- gcc/wide-int-print.cc.jj 2014-05-11 22:21:04.0 +0200
> +++ gcc/wide-int
Hi!
Most of this probably doesn't need explanation, just the
expand_sdiv_pow2 change - shift_cost only tracks shift counts to
MAX_BITS_PER_WORD (but, for consistency between e.g. i?86 and x86_64 -m32
we'd better use BITS_PER_WORD instead as in most other expmed.c places),
when called with larger v