On 09/27/2016 11:29 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 09/26/2016 02:30 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Hi Martin,
I'm afraid there may be further fallout from your patch. GCC
now bootstraps fine on my tester, but building Wine I started
to see
internal compiler error: in format_floating, at
gimple-ssa-s
On 09/27/2016 11:29 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 09/26/2016 02:30 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Hi Martin,
I'm afraid there may be further fallout from your patch. GCC
now bootstraps fine on my tester, but building Wine I started
to see
internal compiler error: in format_floating, at
gimple-ssa-s
On 09/26/2016 02:30 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Hi Martin,
I'm afraid there may be further fallout from your patch. GCC
now bootstraps fine on my tester, but building Wine I started
to see
internal compiler error: in format_floating, at gimple-ssa-sprintf.c:1165
four or so days ago.
https://
Hi Martin,
I'm afraid there may be further fallout from your patch. GCC
now bootstraps fine on my tester, but building Wine I started
to see
internal compiler error: in format_floating, at gimple-ssa-sprintf.c:1165
four or so days ago.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77740 has t
On 09/22/2016 01:46 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 09:24:11AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 06:38:54PM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 09/21/2016 09:09 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
When looking at PR77676, I've noticed various small formatting etc.
issues, lik
What I would be even more grateful for is a review of the error
prone parts like those that caused the bootstrap failure. I.e.,
any lingering assumptions about integer sizes between the host
I must say I'm surprised you do all your computations in HOST_WIDE_INT,
rather than say in wide_int, the
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 09:24:11AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 06:38:54PM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
> > On 09/21/2016 09:09 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > >When looking at PR77676, I've noticed various small formatting etc.
> > >issues, like not using is_gimple_* APIs where
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 06:38:54PM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 09/21/2016 09:09 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >When looking at PR77676, I've noticed various small formatting etc.
> >issues, like not using is_gimple_* APIs where we have them, not using
> >gimple_call_builtin_p/gimple_call_fndecl (t
On 09/21/2016 09:09 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
When looking at PR77676, I've noticed various small formatting etc.
issues, like not using is_gimple_* APIs where we have them, not using
gimple_call_builtin_p/gimple_call_fndecl (this one actually can show up,
if e.g. uses the builtin with incorr
Hi!
When looking at PR77676, I've noticed various small formatting etc.
issues, like not using is_gimple_* APIs where we have them, not using
gimple_call_builtin_p/gimple_call_fndecl (this one actually can show up,
if e.g. uses the builtin with incorrect arguments (fewer, different
types etc.)), o
10 matches
Mail list logo
