On Tue, 21 Feb 2012, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This function spends significant amount of code to update the virtual
> uses/defs in the new sequence, but only handles that way stores, not
> non-pure/const calls, so we ICE during tree DSE on this testcase, because
> vop has been marked for re
Hi!
This function spends significant amount of code to update the virtual
uses/defs in the new sequence, but only handles that way stores, not
non-pure/const calls, so we ICE during tree DSE on this testcase, because
vop has been marked for renaming.
Fixed thusly, bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64
