On Apr 4, 2017, at 4:19 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Here's one more that somebody reported to the unofficial github
> mirror: https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/pull/6/files
>
> Committed to trunk.
Thanks.
On 03/04/17 23:31 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 03/04/17 20:06 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 03/04/17 11:48 -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
[ dup, I sent the wrong from the wrong email address, you might not see it
because of that ]
On Apr 3, 2017, at 11:47 AM, Mike Stump wrote:
On Apr 3, 2
On 03/04/17 20:06 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 03/04/17 11:48 -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
[ dup, I sent the wrong from the wrong email address, you might not see it
because of that ]
On Apr 3, 2017, at 11:47 AM, Mike Stump wrote:
On Apr 3, 2017, at 10:53 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
This
On 03/04/17 11:48 -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
[ dup, I sent the wrong from the wrong email address, you might not see it
because of that ]
On Apr 3, 2017, at 11:47 AM, Mike Stump wrote:
On Apr 3, 2017, at 10:53 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
This fixes lots of typos throughout the tree. Can this
On Apr 3, 2017, at 10:53 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> This fixes lots of typos throughout the tree. Can this be committed to
> trunk as obvious?
Yes, it can. However, I like it when even this patch is reviewed. I reviewed
it, looks good.
You missed initialisers -> initializers.
Not sure I
This fixes lots of typos throughout the tree. Can this be committed to
trunk as obvious?
I've bootstrapped the C and C++ compilers, but not Ada, and of course
not compiled all the target changes in gcc/config/*
Is one big commit OK, or one per-ChangeLog? Or something else?
(Currently I have one
