On July 14, 2016 5:28:03 PM GMT+02:00, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>Hi!
>
>As mentioned in the PR, we ICE on the following testcase, because
>tree-data-ref.c for VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR(0) attempts to create
>ADDR_EXPR of INTEGER_CST, which is not really valid.
>
>I've successfully bootstrapped/regtested earli
Hi!
As mentioned in the PR, we ICE on the following testcase, because
tree-data-ref.c for VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR(0) attempts to create
ADDR_EXPR of INTEGER_CST, which is not really valid.
I've successfully bootstrapped/regtested earlier version of this patch
with is_gimple_constant instead of is_gimpl