On Mon, 5 Nov 2018, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> My recent change for PR86844 broke the following testcases.
>
> The problem is that we are processing the stores in the bitpos/bitsize
> order. The change PR86844 change was about if we try to merge two
> overlapping stores of INTEGER_CST, we n
Hi!
My recent change for PR86844 broke the following testcases.
The problem is that we are processing the stores in the bitpos/bitsize
order. The change PR86844 change was about if we try to merge two
overlapping stores of INTEGER_CST, we need to go through all other stores
that are overlapping
