On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 09:25:40PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The problem on this testcase is that we have
> (debug_insn 30 29 31 7 (var_location:HI D#1 (subreg:HI (reg/v:SI 93 [ p ])
> 0)) pr59166.c:20 -1
> (nil))
> and split_live_ranges_for_shrink_wrap decides to replace
> SImod
On 11/26/13 13:25, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
The problem on this testcase is that we have
(debug_insn 30 29 31 7 (var_location:HI D#1 (subreg:HI (reg/v:SI 93 [ p ]) 0))
pr59166.c:20 -1
(nil))
and split_live_ranges_for_shrink_wrap decides to replace
SImode pseudo 93 with some other SImode p
On 11/26/13 13:34, Steven Bosscher wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 9:25 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
\> PR rtl-optimization/59166
* ira.c (find_moveable_pseudos): Use DF_REF_REAL_LOC instead of
DF_REF_LOC in validate_change call.
(split_live_ranges_for_shrink_wrap):
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 9:25 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> \> PR rtl-optimization/59166
>> * ira.c (find_moveable_pseudos): Use DF_REF_REAL_LOC instead of
>> DF_REF_LOC in validate_change call.
>> (split_live_ran
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 9:25 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
\> PR rtl-optimization/59166
> * ira.c (find_moveable_pseudos): Use DF_REF_REAL_LOC instead of
> DF_REF_LOC in validate_change call.
> (split_live_ranges_for_shrink_wrap): Likewise.
>
> * gcc.dg/torture/pr
Hi!
The problem on this testcase is that we have
(debug_insn 30 29 31 7 (var_location:HI D#1 (subreg:HI (reg/v:SI 93 [ p ]) 0))
pr59166.c:20 -1
(nil))
and split_live_ranges_for_shrink_wrap decides to replace
SImode pseudo 93 with some other SImode pseudo. But it
uses DF_REF_LOC, which is ad
