Re: [PATCH] Fix split-path-5.c testcase (PR testsuite/88454)

2018-12-13 Thread Jeff Law
On 12/13/18 12:49 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 09:56:46PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote: >> Note that split-path-5 has the same basic structure. A half-diamond >> with a single statement in the middle block that should be trivially >> if-convertable if profitable. So I adju

Re: [PATCH] Fix split-path-5.c testcase (PR testsuite/88454)

2018-12-13 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 08:49:53AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 09:56:46PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote: > > Note that split-path-5 has the same basic structure. A half-diamond > > with a single statement in the middle block that should be trivially > > if-convertable if profitab

[PATCH] Fix split-path-5.c testcase (PR testsuite/88454)

2018-12-12 Thread Jakub Jelinek
Hi! On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 09:56:46PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote: > Note that split-path-5 has the same basic structure. A half-diamond > with a single statement in the middle block that should be trivially > if-convertable if profitable. So I adjusted that testcase. The split-path-5.c testcase now