On October 3, 2017 1:55:35 PM GMT+02:00, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 01:24:32PM +0300, Alexander Monakov wrote:
>> On Tue, 3 Oct 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> > The qsort cmp transitivity checks may fail with the
>sort_by_operand_rank
>> > comparator, because if one of the operan
On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 01:24:32PM +0300, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Oct 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > The qsort cmp transitivity checks may fail with the sort_by_operand_rank
> > comparator, because if one of the operands has stmt_to_insert and the
> > other doesn't (but likely also if
On October 3, 2017 12:00:21 PM GMT+02:00, Jakub Jelinek
wrote:
>Hi!
>
>The qsort cmp transitivity checks may fail with the
>sort_by_operand_rank
>comparator, because if one of the operands has stmt_to_insert and the
>other doesn't (but likely also if one SSA_NAME is (D) and the other is
>not),
>w
On Tue, 3 Oct 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> The qsort cmp transitivity checks may fail with the sort_by_operand_rank
> comparator, because if one of the operands has stmt_to_insert and the
> other doesn't (but likely also if one SSA_NAME is (D) and the other is not),
> we fallthrough into SSA_NAME_V
Hi!
The qsort cmp transitivity checks may fail with the sort_by_operand_rank
comparator, because if one of the operands has stmt_to_insert and the
other doesn't (but likely also if one SSA_NAME is (D) and the other is not),
we fallthrough into SSA_NAME_VERSION comparison, but if both aren't (D) an
