On 08/01/2017 03:46 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 07/27/2017 01:48 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
Hello.
As reported in mentioned PR, we segfault in gcov tool when one uses -a.
It's caused
On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 07/27/2017 01:48 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> As reported in mentioned PR, we segfault in gcov tool when one uses -a.
>>> It's caused by fact
>>> that vectors b
On 07/27/2017 01:48 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
Hello.
As reported in mentioned PR, we segfault in gcov tool when one uses -a. It's
caused by fact
that vectors blocks and block_lists have indices kept in sync and as one
removes an element
f
On 07/27/2017 01:48 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> As reported in mentioned PR, we segfault in gcov tool when one uses -a. It's
>> caused by fact
>> that vectors blocks and block_lists have indices kept in sync and as one
>> remo
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> Hello.
>
> As reported in mentioned PR, we segfault in gcov tool when one uses -a. It's
> caused by fact
> that vectors blocks and block_lists have indices kept in sync and as one
> removes an element
> from blocks via:
>blocked.erase (
e: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 14:21:52 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Fix segfault in gcov.c (PR gcov-profile/81561).
gcc/ChangeLog:
2017-07-26 Martin Liska
PR gcov-profile/81561
* gcov.c (unblock): Make unblocking safe as we need to preserve
index correspondence of blocks and block_lists.
---
gcc/gcov.c | 1
