On 11/09/14 21:10, Jeff Law wrote:
On 09/08/14 11:21, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
Anyway here is the modified check:
Thanks. Just needs an updated ChangeLog and it's good for the trunk.
committed to trunk on behalf of Wilco as r215205 after pass bootstrapping.
2014-09-12 Wilco Dijkstra
On 09/08/14 11:21, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
Thanks! Jakub noticed a potential problem in this area a while back,
but I never came up with any code to trigger and have kept that issue on
my todo list ever since.
Rather than ensuring the inserted copy write a single register, it seems
to me we're be
> Thanks! Jakub noticed a potential problem in this area a while back,
> but I never came up with any code to trigger and have kept that issue on
> my todo list ever since.
>
> Rather than ensuring the inserted copy write a single register, it seems
> to me we're better off ensuring that the numb
On 09/04/14 08:05, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
Hi,
While changing register costs for AArch64 (patches to follow), the test
gcc.target/aarch64/vect-mult.c fails. This is caused by ree inserting a TI mode
copy of a DI
register. Since TI mode requires 2 registers, this results in silent corruption
of t
Hi,
While changing register costs for AArch64 (patches to follow), the test
gcc.target/aarch64/vect-mult.c fails. This is caused by ree inserting a TI mode
copy of a DI
register. Since TI mode requires 2 registers, this results in silent corruption
of the 2nd register.
After split2:
(insn 149
