Re: [PATCH] Fix pr70061

2016-03-06 Thread Jeff Law
On 03/05/2016 01:02 PM, Richard Henderson wrote: The problem is that we are emitting copy sequences to edges without caring for deferred popping of arguments. Thus when we began emitting code for the first block, which in this case starts with a label, we had 32 bytes of pending stack adjustment

[PATCH] Fix pr70061

2016-03-05 Thread Richard Henderson
The problem is that we are emitting copy sequences to edges without caring for deferred popping of arguments. Thus when we began emitting code for the first block, which in this case starts with a label, we had 32 bytes of pending stack adjustment, which emit_label flushed. The ICE is due to the