On September 16, 2016 12:48:04 AM GMT+02:00, Jakub Jelinek
wrote:
>Hi!
>
>As mentioned in the PR, during expand_arith_overflow expansion
>expand_neg_overflow falls through into expand_addsub_overflow, so
>expands
>roughly the same code twice and keeps perhaps the less efficient
>version
>around.
Hi!
As mentioned in the PR, during expand_arith_overflow expansion
expand_neg_overflow falls through into expand_addsub_overflow, so expands
roughly the same code twice and keeps perhaps the less efficient version
around.
Fixed thusly, bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for