On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:07:41AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 07:22:24PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > Not sure either. Needs to be investigated. BTW, built-in trap is also
> > nothrow AFAIR.
>
> I think the bug is in the Go FE which incorrectly doesn't set
> TREE_TH
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 07:22:24PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On August 21, 2015 6:42:15 PM GMT+02:00, Marek Polacek
> wrote:
> >On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 06:23:09PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> >> Yes, but gimple_call_noreturn_p is false on __builtin_trap.
> >That's
> >> >quite
> >> >> c
On August 21, 2015 6:42:15 PM GMT+02:00, Marek Polacek
wrote:
>On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 06:23:09PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
>> >> Yes, but gimple_call_noreturn_p is false on __builtin_trap.
>That's
>> >quite
>> >> confusing... but flags_from_decl_or_type really returns 0 for
>> >__builtin_tra
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 06:23:09PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> Yes, but gimple_call_noreturn_p is false on __builtin_trap. That's
> >quite
> >> confusing... but flags_from_decl_or_type really returns 0 for
> >__builtin_trap.
> >Well, if that's intentional (and offhand I have no idea if it is
On August 21, 2015 5:09:46 PM GMT+02:00, Jeff Law wrote:
>On 08/21/2015 08:41 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 03:37:38PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Marek Polacek
>wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 01:27:43PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
On August 21, 2015 5:09:46 PM GMT+02:00, Jeff Law wrote:
>On 08/21/2015 08:41 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 03:37:38PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Marek Polacek
>wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 01:27:43PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
On 08/21/2015 08:41 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 03:37:38PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 01:27:43PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
This fixe
On 08/21/2015 08:41 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 03:37:38PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 01:27:43PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
This fixe
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 03:37:38PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 01:27:43PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> >> > This fixes the libgo breakage. Seems I re
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 01:27:43PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
>> > This fixes the libgo breakage. Seems I really should have removed the
>> > edge after we split the block with nul
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 01:27:43PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > This fixes the libgo breakage. Seems I really should have removed the
> > edge after we split the block with null dereference after __builtin_trap
> > statement so that it'
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> This fixes the libgo breakage. Seems I really should have removed the
> edge after we split the block with null dereference after __builtin_trap
> statement so that it's unreachable.
>
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux + ppc64-linux
This fixes the libgo breakage. Seems I really should have removed the
edge after we split the block with null dereference after __builtin_trap
statement so that it's unreachable.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux + ppc64-linux + bootstrapped on
aarch64-linux, ok for trunk?
2015-08-21 Mare
13 matches
Mail list logo
