On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 08:42:27PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> > So, where do we want to do that instead? E.g. should it be e.g. in
>> > tree_versionable_function_p directly and let the inlin
On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 08:42:27PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > So, where do we want to do that instead? E.g. should it be e.g. in
> > tree_versionable_function_p directly and let the inliner (if it doesn't do
> > already) also treat optimize(0) funct
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 08:42:27PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> So, where do we want to do that instead? E.g. should it be e.g. in
> tree_versionable_function_p directly and let the inliner (if it doesn't do
> already) also treat optimize(0) functions that aren't always_inline as
> noinline?
So,
