On 1/20/19 10:10 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> On 1/20/19 4:40 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 5:29 AM Bernd Edlinger
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> I tried to build linux yesterday, and became aware that there are a few
>>> false-positive warnings with -Waddress-of-packed-member:
>>>
>
On 1/20/19 6:29 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I tried to build linux yesterday, and became aware that there are a few
> false-positive warnings with -Waddress-of-packed-member:
>
> struct t {
> char a;
> int b;
> int *c;
> int d[10];
> } __attribute__((packed));
>
> struct t t0;
On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 9:10 AM Bernd Edlinger
wrote:
>
> On 1/20/19 4:40 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 5:29 AM Bernd Edlinger
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>
> >> I tried to build linux yesterday, and became aware that there are a few
> >> false-positive warnings with -Waddre
On 1/20/19 4:40 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 5:29 AM Bernd Edlinger
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> I tried to build linux yesterday, and became aware that there are a few
>> false-positive warnings with -Waddress-of-packed-member:
>>
>> struct t {
>> char a;
>> int b;
>> int *c;
On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 5:29 AM Bernd Edlinger
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> I tried to build linux yesterday, and became aware that there are a few
> false-positive warnings with -Waddress-of-packed-member:
>
> struct t {
> char a;
> int b;
> int *c;
> int d[10];
> } __attribute__((packed));
>
> s
Hi,
I tried to build linux yesterday, and became aware that there are a few
false-positive warnings with -Waddress-of-packed-member:
struct t {
char a;
int b;
int *c;
int d[10];
} __attribute__((packed));
struct t t0;
struct t *t1;
struct t **t2;
t2 = &t1;
i1 = t0.c;
I fixed them quic
