Re: [PATCH] Fix ipcp_transform_function (PR tree-optimization/58984)

2013-11-05 Thread Richard Biener
On Mon, 4 Nov 2013, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > This patch fixes PR58984, where determine_known_aggregate_parts > notices that o.f0 = 1 store (because of ESRA) and p.f0 = 1 > store (because the field isn't a bitfield) are known constants > at offset 0 of the first parameter, but doesn't record

[PATCH] Fix ipcp_transform_function (PR tree-optimization/58984)

2013-11-04 Thread Jakub Jelinek
Hi! This patch fixes PR58984, where determine_known_aggregate_parts notices that o.f0 = 1 store (because of ESRA) and p.f0 = 1 store (because the field isn't a bitfield) are known constants at offset 0 of the first parameter, but doesn't record the access of that size (8 bits) and happily replaces