Hi,
> Based on this opinion, the patch is OK for mainline, if there are no
...
Checked in: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2012-10/msg00187.html
K
We also plan to test these changes along with LRA
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>
>>> This patch aims to fix all stability issues related to using the first
>>> scheduler in gcc
>>> for x86 target (there several reported
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> This patch aims to fix all stability issues related to using the first
>> scheduler in gcc
>> for x86 target (there several reported issues related to this problem).
>>
>> Main idea of this activity is mostly to provide user a possibility to
Ping.
2012/9/18 Yuri Rumyantsev :
> Hi All,
>
> Forgot to attch the patch.
>
> 2012/9/18 Yuri Rumyantsev :
>> Hi All,
>>
>> This patch aims to fix all stability issues related to using the first
>> scheduler in gcc
>> for x86 target (there several reported issues related to this problem).
>>
>> Ma
Hello!
> This patch aims to fix all stability issues related to using the first
> scheduler in gcc
> for x86 target (there several reported issues related to this problem).
>
> Main idea of this activity is mostly to provide user a possibility to
> safely turn on first scheduler for his codes. In
Hi All,
Forgot to attch the patch.
2012/9/18 Yuri Rumyantsev :
> Hi All,
>
> This patch aims to fix all stability issues related to using the first
> scheduler in gcc
> for x86 target (there several reported issues related to this problem).
>
> Main idea of this activity is mostly to provide user
