Re: [PATCH] Fix inlining of calls with NULL block (PR56515)

2013-03-05 Thread Richard Biener
On Mon, 4 Mar 2013, Jan Hubicka wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 01:42:51PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: > > > When inlining call stmts with a NULL gimple_block we still remap > > > all the callee blocks into a block tree copy but we'll end up > > > not referencing it from anywhere. This causes

Re: [PATCH] Fix inlining of calls with NULL block (PR56515)

2013-03-04 Thread Jan Hubicka
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 01:42:51PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: > > When inlining call stmts with a NULL gimple_block we still remap > > all the callee blocks into a block tree copy but we'll end up > > not referencing it from anywhere. This causes verification failures > > because then we have

Re: [PATCH] Fix inlining of calls with NULL block (PR56515)

2013-03-04 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 01:42:51PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: > When inlining call stmts with a NULL gimple_block we still remap > all the callee blocks into a block tree copy but we'll end up > not referencing it from anywhere. This causes verification failures > because then we have nothing re

[PATCH] Fix inlining of calls with NULL block (PR56515)

2013-03-04 Thread Richard Biener
When inlining call stmts with a NULL gimple_block we still remap all the callee blocks into a block tree copy but we'll end up not referencing it from anywhere. This causes verification failures because then we have nothing refering to the inline stmt blocks. This seems to be an issue mostly wit