Re: [PATCH] Fix in-tree gmp/mpfr/mpc generation (PR 67728)

2016-03-29 Thread Richard Biener
On Tue, 29 Mar 2016, Bernd Edlinger wrote: > On 29.03.2016 at 10:32, Richard Biener wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Bernd Edlinger > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> as described in the tracker we have bootstrap problems with in-tree > >> gmp-6.1.0 > >> on certain targets, and also a

Re: [PATCH] Fix in-tree gmp/mpfr/mpc generation (PR 67728)

2016-03-29 Thread Bernd Edlinger
On 29.03.2016 at 10:32, Richard Biener wrote: > On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Bernd Edlinger > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> as described in the tracker we have bootstrap problems with in-tree gmp-6.1.0 >> on certain targets, and also a linker issue with check-mpc due to the changed >> mpfr library pa

Re: [PATCH] Fix in-tree gmp/mpfr/mpc generation (PR 67728)

2016-03-29 Thread Richard Biener
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Bernd Edlinger wrote: > > Hi, > > as described in the tracker we have bootstrap problems with in-tree gmp-6.1.0 > on certain targets, and also a linker issue with check-mpc due to the changed > mpfr library path. Hum, in-tree gmp 6.1.0 is not supported (only the v

[PATCH] Fix in-tree gmp/mpfr/mpc generation (PR 67728)

2016-03-28 Thread Bernd Edlinger
Hi, as described in the tracker we have bootstrap problems with in-tree gmp-6.1.0 on certain targets, and also a linker issue with check-mpc due to the changed mpfr library path. These are triggered by overriding CFLAGS and LDFLAGS in in-tree builds. It did not happen with the gmp/mpfr/mpc versi