> On 03/12/2011 02:04 PM, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
> > On 03/12/2011 08:01 AM, John David Anglin wrote:
> >>> I have reviewed the patch and FX'scomments. So far so good.
> >>>
> >>> I may have missed something in the thread, but are you planning
> >>> modifications to the functions that call convert_re
On 03/12/2011 02:04 PM, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
On 03/12/2011 08:01 AM, John David Anglin wrote:
I have reviewed the patch and FX'scomments. So far so good.
I may have missed something in the thread, but are you planning
modifications to the functions that call convert_real to allow the nan
or inf
On 03/12/2011 08:01 AM, John David Anglin wrote:
I have reviewed the patch and FX'scomments. So far so good.
I may have missed something in the thread, but are you planning
modifications to the functions that call convert_real to allow the nan
or inf strings to be passed to convert_real?
The r
> I have reviewed the patch and FX'scomments. So far so good.
>
> I may have missed something in the thread, but are you planning
> modifications to the functions that call convert_real to allow the nan
> or inf strings to be passed to convert_real?
>
> The read_real function is already handling
