[wwwdocs] svnwrite.html PATCH for Re: [PATCH] Fix hoist-register-pressure testcases for -m31 on s390x

On Fri, 20 Feb 2015, Mike Stump wrote: >> Yes. ISTM that this kind of patch (twiddling target conditionals in >> the testsuite) should be OK for a target maintainer to apply without >> requesting approval, even though it's not in the backend proper. > Yes, that’s right. I tried to capture this

Re: [PATCH] Fix hoist-register-pressure testcases for -m31 on s390x

On Feb 20, 2015, at 10:53 AM, Jeff Law wrote: > On 02/19/15 10:27, Andreas Krebbel wrote: >> >> the attached patch makes the hoist-register-pressure testcases to work >> with -m31 on 64 bit. >> >> Ok to apply? >> >> Bye, >> >> -Andreas- >> >> >> 2015-02-19 Andreas Krebbel >> >> * gc

Re: [PATCH] Fix hoist-register-pressure testcases for -m31 on s390x

On 02/19/15 10:27, Andreas Krebbel wrote: Hi, the attached patch makes the hoist-register-pressure testcases to work with -m31 on 64 bit. Ok to apply? Bye, -Andreas- 2015-02-19 Andreas Krebbel * gcc.dg/hoist-register-pressure-1.c: Make S/390 target check work with -m31 o

[PATCH] Fix hoist-register-pressure testcases for -m31 on s390x

Hi, the attached patch makes the hoist-register-pressure testcases to work with -m31 on 64 bit. Ok to apply? Bye, -Andreas- 2015-02-19 Andreas Krebbel * gcc.dg/hoist-register-pressure-1.c: Make S/390 target check work with -m31 on 64 bit. * gcc.dg/hoist-register-pr