On 16 January 2017 at 10:43, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2017, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>
>> On 13 January 2017 at 12:16, Bin.Cheng wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> >>
>> >> The following is an attempt to change those testcases to be less dependent
>
Hi Richard,
> The following is an attempt to change those testcases to be less dependent
> on previous passes. The original motivation of the testcases seems to be
> testing SCEV capabilities and in turn IVOPTs decisions, thus the testcases
> are changed to check the IVO dump, use the GIMPLE FE f
On Mon, 16 Jan 2017, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> On 13 January 2017 at 12:16, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>
> >> The following is an attempt to change those testcases to be less dependent
> >> on previous passes. The original motivation of the tes
On 13 January 2017 at 12:16, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> The following is an attempt to change those testcases to be less dependent
>> on previous passes. The original motivation of the testcases seems to be
>> testing SCEV capabilities and in
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> The following is an attempt to change those testcases to be less dependent
> on previous passes. The original motivation of the testcases seems to be
> testing SCEV capabilities and in turn IVOPTs decisions, thus the testcases
> are chang
The following is an attempt to change those testcases to be less dependent
on previous passes. The original motivation of the testcases seems to be
testing SCEV capabilities and in turn IVOPTs decisions, thus the testcases
are changed to check the IVO dump, use the GIMPLE FE feeding the loop
pipe
