Re: [PATCH] Fix for powerpc64 long double complex divide failure

Hi! On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 09:24:31PM +, Patrick McGehearty via Gcc-patches wrote: > This patch resolves the failure of powerpc64 long double complex divide > in native ibm long double format after the patch "Practical improvement > to libgcc complex divide". > See https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil

Re: [PATCH] Fix for powerpc64 long double complex divide failure

On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 11:25:29AM -0500, Patrick McGehearty via Gcc-patches wrote: > Ping... > > The fix is minimal (four lines changed). > I recognize that those familiar with IBM 128-bit floating > point precision is a select set of people. > On the plus side, tests fail without the patch and

Re: [PATCH] Fix for powerpc64 long double complex divide failure

Ping... The fix is minimal (four lines changed). I recognize that those familiar with IBM 128-bit floating point precision is a select set of people. On the plus side, tests fail without the patch and pass with the patch. - patrick On 7/8/2021 4:24 PM, Patrick McGehearty via Gcc-patches wrote:

[PATCH] Fix for powerpc64 long double complex divide failure

This patch resolves the failure of powerpc64 long double complex divide in native ibm long double format after the patch "Practical improvement to libgcc complex divide". See https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101104 The new code uses the following macros which are intended to be mapped