Unfortunately this patch broke bootstrap on AIX (PPC32)
PR bootstrap/64676
- David
On 01/16/15 08:16, Zamyatin, Igor wrote:
Not sure it's possible to merge DF_REG_DEF_CHAIN walk and
DF_REF_CHAIN walk...
OK. Just use the same overall structure if we can't pull the test out into a
single function that could be called from both places.
Thanks, is updated patch ok for trunk?
> > Not sure it's possible to merge DF_REG_DEF_CHAIN walk and
> DF_REF_CHAIN walk...
> OK. Just use the same overall structure if we can't pull the test out into a
> single function that could be called from both places.
>
Thanks, is updated patch ok for trunk?
Igor
Changelog:
gcc
2015-01-1
On 01/15/15 09:36, Zamyatin, Igor wrote:
On 01/13/15 11:01, Zamyatin, Igor wrote:
Is it really sufficient here to verify that all the defs are on latch
predecessors, what about the case where there is a predecessor
without a def. How do you guarantee domination in that case?
ISTM that given
>
> On 01/13/15 11:01, Zamyatin, Igor wrote:
> >>
> >> Is it really sufficient here to verify that all the defs are on latch
> >> predecessors, what about the case where there is a predecessor
> >> without a def. How do you guarantee domination in that case?
> >>
> >> ISTM that given the structur
On 01/13/15 11:01, Zamyatin, Igor wrote:
Is it really sufficient here to verify that all the defs are on latch
predecessors,
what about the case where there is a predecessor without a def. How do
you guarantee domination in that case?
ISTM that given the structure for the code you're writing
>
> Is it really sufficient here to verify that all the defs are on latch
> predecessors,
> what about the case where there is a predecessor without a def. How do
> you guarantee domination in that case?
>
> ISTM that given the structure for the code you're writing that you'd want to
> verify t
On 12/19/14 03:20, Zamyatin, Igor wrote:
Hi!
This is an attempt to extend RTL unroller to allow cases like mentioned in the
PR -
namely when loop has duplicated exit blocks and back edges.
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64, also checking wide range of benchmarks -
spec2K, spec2006, EEMBC
I
Hi!
This is an attempt to extend RTL unroller to allow cases like mentioned in the
PR -
namely when loop has duplicated exit blocks and back edges.
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64, also checking wide range of benchmarks -
spec2K, spec2006, EEMBC
Is it ok for trunk in case if no testing is
