On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 13/04/12 11:13, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Tom de Vries
>> wrote:
>>> Richard,
>>>
>>> this patch fixes PR52743.
>>>
>>> The problem is as follows: blocks 3 and 5, with successor 6 are considered
>>> eq
On 13/04/12 11:13, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
>> Richard,
>>
>> this patch fixes PR52743.
>>
>> The problem is as follows: blocks 3 and 5, with successor 6 are considered
>> equal
>> and merged.
>> ...
>> # BLOCK 3 freq:6102
>> # PRED: 2 [61.
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
> Richard,
>
> this patch fixes PR52743.
>
> The problem is as follows: blocks 3 and 5, with successor 6 are considered
> equal
> and merged.
> ...
> # BLOCK 3 freq:6102
> # PRED: 2 [61.0%] (true,exec)
> # VUSE <.MEMD.1734_10>
> dddD.1710
Richard,
this patch fixes PR52743.
The problem is as follows: blocks 3 and 5, with successor 6 are considered equal
and merged.
...
# BLOCK 3 freq:6102
# PRED: 2 [61.0%] (true,exec)
# VUSE <.MEMD.1734_10>
dddD.1710_3 = bbbD.1703;
goto ;
# SUCC: 6 [100.0%] (fallthru,exec)
# BLOCK
